Throughout the grand, often dramatic spectacle of human history, society has been shaped by distinct classes, each jostling for influence like rowdy children squabbling over the last slice of cake. These classes—social, political, economic, and cultural—emerged from the age-old battle for power, wealth, belief systems, and who had the shiniest objects. While occasionally managing to coexist in a kind of reluctant truce, more often than not, they’ve been locked in fierce competition for dominance, creating the glorious mess we call civilization.
Economic classes have consistently been at the centre of the action, usually determining who gets the biggest share of society’s resources—and let’s face it, it’s rarely the poor. From the days when landowners and merchants strutted about in early agricultural societies to modern times where industrial capitalists sip champagne while the working class toils away, wealth has always been a key marker of power. It was true in feudal systems, where land equalled power, and it remains true today, though now the wealthiest own the means of production rather than castles. The rich have always managed to stay on top because, well, why wouldn’t they?
The concept of social class, that delightful old chestnut, has evolved from being based on birth and lineage (because you really can’t beat good old-fashioned nepotism) to a slightly more fluid system. These days, in modern democracies, you can at least pretend that with enough education, hard work, and the right connections, you can rise the social ladder—though of course, the gap between the wealthy elite and the working poor continues to stretch like an overworked elastic band. Sure, social mobility exists in theory, but good luck to anyone trying to make that leap when the boundaries are practically rigged.
Political classes, too, have never been shy about taking centre stage. Power, as we all know, tends to fall into the hands of those with the sharpest swords, deepest pockets, or in recent centuries, the best soundbites. Monarchs, aristocrats, and now politicians have historically controlled the fates of nations, creating laws, raising armies, and generally doing whatever they can to stay at the top. In the noble name of democracy, elected officials are now tasked with representing the broader population—though, surprise, the wealthy and well-connected still seem to have the most say. After all, who needs the hassle of running a country when you can fund someone to do it for you?
And then we have the cultural class: the intellectuals, religious leaders, and artists who, while not exactly wielding swords or commanding armies, have shaped the values, beliefs, and norms of society through the power of ideas. In the Middle Ages, religious figures like the Catholic Church held sway over not just spiritual beliefs but the daily lives of people, effectively controlling politics through a combination of fire, brimstone, and the odd burning at the stake. Today, religious leaders still manage to pull considerable strings, sometimes reinforcing the power of the political and economic elites, other times delighting in throwing a holy spanner in the works.
The dance between these classes has always been a mix of cooperation, manipulation, and downright conflict. Political decisions, for example, often dictate economic opportunities—usually for the benefit of a few. Meanwhile, cultural and religious norms subtly shape how society views those decisions, ensuring that the whole system runs smoothly (or, as history shows, occasionally derails spectacularly). It’s all interlinked: economic classes don’t just form out of piles of money, but also from the cultural and political values that decide who gets what—and why it’s perfectly fine that the rich get more.
Historically, of course, those at the top have always found ways to impose their values on the rest of us. Feudal Europe was essentially the playground of the land-owning aristocracy, who extracted labour and wealth from peasants, while assuring them that their suffering was all part of the divine plan. Fast forward to industrial capitalist societies, and you’ll find that the bourgeoisie—those charming owners of factories and businesses—did much the same, wringing surplus value out of the working class and pocketing the rewards. You might call it exploitation; they prefer to call it “economic success.”
But domination isn’t always about who has the most cash. Sometimes, it’s about who can convince everyone that their values are the “right” ones. Move into the cultural class, including religious leaders and intellectuals, who have often wielded control through ideological means. The Catholic Church was the undisputed heavyweight champion of moral and spiritual authority in medieval Europe, often pulling the strings behind monarchs and rulers. And even today, religious and cultural institutions continue to shape societal norms, sometimes working hand in hand with the economic elites, sometimes engaging in dramatic turf wars.
In today’s world, the power dynamics between these classes have evolved, but the battles remain just as fierce. The capitalists, while still quite powerful, now face stiff competition from other elite groups—particularly the liberal political class and the cultural titans who dominate the media and tech industries. Political and social conflicts have become a bit of a circus, with cultural influence, political manoeuvring, and economic interests all jostling for the spotlight. In this chaos, it’s hard to know who’s really in charge, though one suspects it’s still the people with the most money.
This brings us to Karl Marx, who, bless him, thought he had it all figured out with his theory of class conflict. Marx believed history was driven by the antagonism between economic classes—the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He predicted this would all culminate in revolution when the economic interests of these groups could no longer be reconciled. While Marx deserves credit for highlighting the role of economics in social conflict, he perhaps underestimated the sheer power of cultural forces. It turns out that intellectuals, religious leaders, and media moguls can shape society just as profoundly as any capitalist or factory owner.
Cultural leaders have long shaped ideologies that either reinforce or upend the social order. Take the Protestant Reformation, for example, a dramatic clash not over economic issues but over religious dissatisfaction with the Catholic Church. This cultural and religious rift transformed the political and economic structure of Europe, proving that economic factors alone don’t always determine the course of history. Even in more recent times, ideological battles like the Cold War were as much about competing worldviews as they were about economics, with cultural elites—writers, academics, and media figures—crafting the narratives that shaped public opinion on both sides.
Today, the rise of identity politics and cultural conflicts often overshadow old-fashioned economic class struggles. Debates over race, gender, and sexuality dominate the headlines, while discussions about wealth inequality or labour rights get left in the dust. The cultural class—academics, journalists, and activists—now seems to wield immense power in shaping public discourse, framing political battles more around cultural supremacy than economic interests. Understanding the full scope of class conflict today requires acknowledging that power comes not just from owning the factories, but from controlling the narratives—and, perhaps more importantly, the hashtags.
————
Rajeev Ahmed
The Editor of Geopolits.com and the Author of the book titled Bengal Nexus
English (United States) 
English (UK)