The crisis in Myanmar poses a significant threat to Bangladesh’s national security. The influx of refugees, the spillover of violence, and the potential for regional instability all contribute to the urgency of addressing this issue. Bangladesh must tread carefully in its dealings with the various warring factions in Myanmar and northeastern India, while also strengthening its border security and defense capabilities. Additionally, working closely with international partners is crucial to effectively address the crisis in Myanmar and protect Bangladesh’s interests.
Read moreUnveiling the Underbelly of Civil Societies in Bangladesh: A Call for Action
The compromised state of civil society in Bangladesh is disconcerting. It has destroyed civil society’s ability to function as a robust, neutral, and independent watchdog. Furthermore, civil society has not only depleted the country’s profound cultural heritage but has also birthed security and sovereignty challenges. The Rohingya crisis serves as a poignant example where civil society, buoyed by Western and local media, pressured the government to shelter Rohingyas, compromising the nation’s security.
Read moreBeyond Ballots: Reimagining Democracy in Bangladesh for Social Justice in Global Contexts
The influence of external actors, including former colonial powers and international corporations, are skewign the priorities of Bangladesh. These influences often reinforce a narrow conception of democracy, emphasizing electoral processes over the broader democratic principles of accountability, transparency, and inclusivity. As a result, the potential of democracy to serve as a vehicle for social justice is compromised, and the concept becomes a tool for maintaining the status quo rather than a means of transformation.
Read moreThe Precipice of Political Discord: Bangladesh’s Struggle for Stability in a Global Maelstrom
The political unrest within Bangladesh’s borders is not insulated from global influences. There are indications that the United States and its strategic allies are extending covert support to the opposition. While such maneuvers may be driven by geopolitical considerations, particularly those aligned with the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy, they risk destabilizing Bangladesh. The potential for creating a security vacuum in the strategically vital Bay of Bengal region is a cause for concern, particularly given the region’s significance in the power dynamics involving China and India.
Read moreStrategic Insights into Israel-Hamas War, Information Warfare, and the Quest for Lasting Peace
The Hamas offensive, Israel’s defence strategies, and the wider implications across the Middle East have unveiled the bursting nature of regional politics. This ever-evolving chessboard, where alliances shift and new actors come to the forefront, underscores the utmost importance of a deep understanding of the interplay between power, diplomacy, and conflict. Besides, the erosion of trust in mainstream media echoes the profound influence of information warfare on public discourse. In a world awash with falsehoods and competing narratives, strategic thinkers must adeptly distinguish fact from fiction and appreciate the broader consequences of these trends on the global political stage. Additionally, we must keep in mind that the illusory nature of ceasefires stands as a poignant reminder that peace is not a mere absence of conflict but a multifaceted endeavour requiring the resolution of underlying issues. In the realm of strategic thinking, we must acknowledge that temporary halts in hostilities do not guarantee enduring peace. True peace necessitates a holistic approach that addresses the root causes of conflict and aspires to establish a genuine, lasting stability.
Read moreGeopolitical Quagmire of Nagorno-Karabakh
The ongoing situation in Nagorno-Karabakh is a direct result of unsuccessful and insincere diplomatic efforts by both regional and global powers. Their incapacity to effectively address the issue has worsened the crisis, causing a large number of people to leave the region. Additionally, the growing polarization, both regionally and globally, has played a significant role in shaping the current mass migration scenario. This polarization, characterized by sharp divisions and disputes, has added another layer of complexity to the situation, making it increasingly challenging for displaced individuals to find safety and stability. It’s evident that the actions, or lack thereof, by these powers have had a profound impact on the unfolding humanitarian crisis in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Read moreAsserting Sovereignty, Bangladesh Must Condemn the US Visa Restrictions Policy
Some observers argue that the United States aims to foster a pro-US government in Bangladesh to facilitate agreements such as the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA), among others. These agreements could potentially open the door for the deployment of military equipment, including the contentious possibility of nuclear assets, within Bangladesh’s borders. Such actions, seen by some as a way to exert strategic pressure on regional powers like India and China, raise significant concerns about Bangladesh’s sovereignty and its role in shaping regional security dynamics.
Read moreUnited States, Hypocrisy and the Vicious Visa Vendetta
The United States, located 8,500 kilometres from Bangladesh, has nonetheless inserted itself into the heart of Bangladeshi domestic politics. To US Indo-Pacific policymakers, this may seem like a distant adventure, but for Bangladeshis, it has the potential to be a source of political instability for years to come. By interfering in Bangladesh’s internal affairs, the US has opened the floodgates for other powers, such as India, China, Russia, and Japan, to do the same. Therefore, the US must take the total responsibility if Bangladesh faces any catastrophic political consequence.
Read moreSikhs and the Interplay Between India, and the Anglo-Saxon Double Standards and Hypocrisy
Following Justin Trudeau’s startling assertion, it becomes evident that the Sikh community, constituting a modest 1.7% of India’s populace, now occupies a focal point within a geopolitical manoeuvre spearheaded by Canada. This intricate manoeuvre enjoys veiled support from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, collectively operating under the umbrella of the Anglo-Saxon intelligence alliance referred to as ‘the Five Eyes.’
This scenario underscores a significant message: If India seeks to forge a partnership with the Western powers for national development, it must acknowledge that it cannot exercise full strategic sovereignty without the approval of the Anglo-Saxon coalition. In this context, Indian intelligence operations within the framework of the Five Eyes will be subject to Western scrutiny, differing from Western intelligence practises.
Read moreBangladesh Must Shift Narrative from Climate Vulnerability to Energy Sovereignty in the Face of Geopolitical Climate Agendas
It’s essential to acknowledge that Bangladesh’s branding as one of the world’s most climate-vulnerable nations can have a discouraging effect on foreign investments. Typically, investors tend to steer clear of regions with such branding. If Bangladesh leans heavily on climate funds and aligns closely with Western narratives regarding their climate agenda’s economic implications, it could face significant challenges in achieving a sovereign energy mix that ensures a balanced energy supply. Such a balanced mix would be less susceptible to the ups and downs of geopolitical turbulence. The energy future of Bangladesh is not merely a challenge; it’s an exhilarating opportunity to seize control of its destiny in a world defined by shifting energy paradigms and geopolitical rivalries.
Read more