Bangladesh has embraced the digital age with fervor. Social media has become an undeniable force, woven into the daily lives of millions. It is a bustling marketplace for ideas, a platform for connection, and a seemingly endless source of information. Social media is a powerful tool for connection, education, and informed social change.
However, beneath this glittering facade lurks a shadowy underbelly. Social media platforms have become breeding grounds for a different kind of darkness – hate speech. Religious bigotry, ethnic slurs, and calls for violence against minorities fester online, poisoning public discourse. This analysis explores the dark side of social media in Bangladesh, where weaponized information and hate speech pose a threat to the very social fabric it once promised to connect.
The Rohingya refugee crisis of 2016 starkly illustrated the dangers. Social media became a battleground, rife with fabricated stories and inflammatory rhetoric, often laced with doctored images. These digital weapons fueled hatred and violence, turning neighbor against neighbor. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the devastating power of misinformation in the digital age. Furthermore, self-styled moral vigilantes have hijacked social media for shaming and harassing individuals deemed to have violated social norms. Local newspapers report on harrowing incidents where young girls’ lives become a living nightmare after videos going viral, sparking a wave of online bullying and harassment. These incidents highlight the misuse of social media for moral policing and the urgent need for stronger online harassment laws.
The speed and reach of social media have turned platforms into a chaotic courtroom, where users act as judge, jury, and executioner. Complex legal issues are reduced to soundbites and memes, with little regard for evidence or the presumption of innocence. Social media justice, often referred to as cancel culture, can have a chilling effect on free speech and due process. Online mobs quickly target and ostracize individuals based on allegations or opinions, bypassing the judicial system. This damages reputations and livelihoods, even if the allegations are unfounded. This disrespect for judicial processes has already undermined the justice system and erode public trust in Bangladesh.
The vulnerability of social media users and the lack of robust data protection laws in Bangladesh were cruelly exposed in November 2018. A major data breach, meticulously documented by Netfa, a digital rights organization, involved millions of Bangladeshi Facebook users. Imagine your phone number, location, and personal details splashed across the internet – this harsh reality highlighted the importance of online privacy and the need for stricter regulations to safeguard user data.
Social media’s anonymity offers a cloak of invisibility for cybercriminals. These digital tricksters exploit trust inherent in online interactions to orchestrate elaborate social engineering. There are many reports in local media of major online scam operating through Facebook. This elaborate scheme lured unsuspecting users with promises of high returns on fake investment opportunities, highlighting the ever-present threat of online fraud. Phishing links and malware also lurk within the shadows of social media, targeting individuals and businesses alike. The anonymity these platforms afford emboldens criminals, making it difficult for law enforcement to track them down.
Perhaps the most concerning aspect of social media misuse lies in its potential to stifle dissent. Critics allege that Bangladeshi authorities use social media platforms for surveillance, monitoring activity to silence criticism and harass activists.
The dark underbelly of social media in Bangladesh paints a concerning picture for the nation’s future, particularly for its poverty-stricken youth. The ease of spreading misinformation and hate speech creates fertile ground for social manipulation, potentially exploited by criminals and even foreign powers to sow discord and destabilize the country. Social engineering scams and online fraud disproportionately target vulnerable populations, robbing them of their limited resources and eroding trust in online interactions.
Implementing a content moderation framework similar to Germany’s Network Enforcement Act could be effective. This approach would require social media platforms to remove illegal or harmful content within a reasonable timeframe. However, striking a balance with freedom of speech is crucial. Lessons learned from criticisms of the German law can ensure clear definitions of harmful content and robust appeal mechanisms for users who believe their content was wrongly removed.
Singapore’s POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act) offers another valuable model. A similar law could empower authorities to identify and take down demonstrably false content that poses a clear threat to public safety or security. However, transparency is key. The process for identifying and removing false content should be clear and open to public scrutiny to avoid censorship.
Data localization, the practice of requiring social media companies to store user data within Bangladesh’s borders, is another strategy being considered. Proponents argue that this would give the government greater control over user data and improve national security. However, it is important to consider the model of Brazil’s Lei Carolina Dicini Law. This law mandates user consent for data collection, ensures secure data storage practices, and grants users clear rights to access and delete their personal information. Striking a balance between national security and user privacy is essential.
The idea of creating a national social media platform in Bangladesh has also been floated as a potential solution to concerns about foreign influence and data security. However, careful consideration is needed to avoid government control over information dissemination.
Equipping citizens with media literacy skills is crucial. Educational programs can teach users how to critically evaluate information online, identify potential biases, and discern fact from fiction. This approach empowers users to become responsible consumers of information and reduces their susceptibility to manipulation.
Effective regulation requires collaboration between various stakeholders – government, civil society, social media platforms, and the public. Open dialogue can lead to comprehensive regulations that address the needs of all parties involved.
While complete algorithmic transparency might be a challenge, social media platforms should strive to be more open about how their algorithms work. This allows users to understand how content is curated and potentially identify potential biases. Additionally, providing users with more control over their newsfeeds and content recommendations empowers them to manage their online experience and avoid echo chambers.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s Smart Bangladesh vision promises a future of boundless potential, yet beneath the gleaming veneer lies a crucial question: can a nation be truly smart if its citizens are not safe online?
——
Rajeev Ahmed
The Author of Bengal Nexus, and the Editor of geopolits.com
English (United States) 
English (UK)